Fact Sheet
FAQ
Quick Facts
Compare Facts
Forms & Info
Horror Stories
Supporter List
Supporter Resources
Join the Coalition
Tell a Friend
Tell Your Story
Contribute Online
Contribute by Mail
News Articles
Press Releases
Videos
Prop 98 - The BEST YES! Home Owners Facts Places of Worship Facts Small Business Facts Family Farm Facts

THE FACTS ABOUT: 

Proposition 98.  California Property Owners & Farmland Protection Act. California Constitutional Amendment.

Protect Property Rights for all Californians.

Californians for Property Rights Protection is a coalition of homeowners, family farmers, small business owners, and other property owners (small and large) led by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, California Farm Bureau Federation, and The California Alliance to Protect Private Property Rights.  Together, this powerful coalition has qualified Proposition 98, the California Property Owners and Farmland Protection Act (CPOFPA), for the June 3, 2008 ballot.  The CPOFPA is a constitutional amendment. Changes to the constitution made by this initiative can only be made by a majority of voters in the state, not the State Legislature.


Summary of key provisions in the initiative:

  • Private property may not be taken by eminent domain for private use under any circumstances (e.g. to build a shopping center, auto mall or industrial park).
  • Property may be taken by eminent domain only for public use (e.g.. freeway construction, parks, or schools).
  • Property may not be taken by government and used for the same purposes (e.g. residential housing cannot be used for government housing).
  • Family farms and open space are protected from seizures by government for the purpose of selling the natural resources.
  • If a public agency takes property under false pretenses, or abandons its plans, the property must be offered for sale to the original owner at the original price and the property tax would be assessed at the value of the property when it was originally condemned.
  • If farmers or business owners are evicted by eminent domain, they would be entitled to compensation for temporary business losses, relocation expenses, business reestablishment costs and other reasonable expenses.
  • Government may not set the price at which property owners sell or lease their property. However, tenants who live in rent-regulated communities will continue to receive the benefit of those regulations as long as they live in their residences.

Key Issues:

  • The Constitution of the State of California provides that, "All people by nature are free and independent and have inalienable rights. Among these are enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing and protecting property . . ." Prop 98 reaffirms and strengthens the private property protections set forth in our state constitution.
  • Property rights are a fundamental, core value among California voters. Statewide survey research shows more than 67% support for an eminent domain reform ballot initiative - Republicans, Democrats, Independents, seniors and baby boomers all support the initiative.
  • Enhanced farmland protections provided in this amendment increase support for this measure among environmentally concerned voters. Prohibiting sale or lease price regulations protects property owners when they sell or lease their property to others. At the same time, Prop 98 protects current tenants from unanticipated increases in their rents.
  • Nothing in Prop 98 would prohibit or limit legitimate land use decisions, zoning, work place laws, or environmental protections. Nor would it expose public agencies to costly litigation.

See a comparison chart between the Prop 98 and the League of Cities' sham initiative, Prop 99.
Download a copy of the Fact Sheet here.
 

Sign Up For Coalition Updates

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Zip Code

Take Action now

Join the Team Contribute Tell Your Story

Eminent Threat

Latest news about victims and those leading the fight against eminent domain abuse

Sunday, June 8, 2008
Prop. 99 does far too little to reform eminent domain. It protects only owner-occupiers of single-family homes and does nothing for businesses or other property owners.  more...
Saturday, June 7, 2008
Voters shouldn't be deceived into thinking Prop. 99 solves the eminent domain problem or that the measure's backers were acting in their interest.  more...
Thursday, June 5, 2008
After acknowledging Prop. 99's flaws and promising to pursue additional reforms, League President Jim Madaffer yesterday shamelessly stated the league was not interested in additional reforms and that that "any further restrictions should be left to individual cities."  more...
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Analysts said Tuesday's primary election did little to settle the ongoing property rights issues.   more...
Wednesday, June 4, 2008
Prop. 98 was the only measure on the ballot that addressed the Kelo decision by providing comprehensive protections to all private property and would have phased out dated rental policies not practiced in 46 states.  By placing a second eminent domain measure on the ballot, opponents of private property rights created enough confusion between the ballot measures to defeat Prop. 98.  more...
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
California Communities, a little-known joint powers agency that may have contributed millions to defeat eminent domain reforms should be audited and subject to some sort of controls, state and local elected officials say.  more...
Tuesday, May 27, 2008
While accusing Prop 98 supporters of having a hidden agenda, it turns out that the real secret behind this battle is the funding sources for the anti-property rights effort.  On Sunday, an Orange County Register investigative news story reported how the League has been using an obscure public agency to divert public money into political campaign accounts to deny Californians private property rights.   more...
Thursday, May 22, 2008
A public agency controlled by the League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties is reported to have spent millions in public money to oppose private property rights!  more...
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
The status quo is unacceptable. Local governments should not be able to take prime location from one taxpaying business and give it to a pet developer.  more...
Monday, May 19, 2008
Californians will vote on Proposition 99, a ballot initiative sponsored by groups representing cities, counties, redevelopment agencies and other pro-condemnation interests. It purports to protect property rights against eminent domain, but it actually provides almost no protection.  more...
Read More »
YesProp98.com | Contact Us | Copyright ©2008
A Coalition of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association, funded by Thomas Coates, the California Association of Realtors Issues PAC, and the California Farm Bureau Federation, Yes Prop. 98 621 So. Westmoreland Ave., Suite 202 Los Angeles, CA 90005